Comments on: Content Management Systems reviewed http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/ XPloring the alternatives Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:32:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9 by: Dave Briggs http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-29 Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:24:05 +0000 http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-29 The Release Candidate version of WordPress 2.0 <a href="http://wordpress.org/development/2005/12/wordpress-20-release-candidate/" rel="nofollow">has been released</a> and, having set up a test blog, it looks pretty good! The Release Candidate version of WordPress 2.0 has been released and, having set up a test blog, it looks pretty good!

]]> by: Quentin http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-15 Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:28:58 +0000 http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-15 Thanks Dave - now fixed! Thanks Dave - now fixed!

]]> by: Dave Briggs http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-14 Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:24:24 +0000 http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-14 WordPress is still a great bit of software. Am sure it will all be fine! One thing though, with multiple contributors it might be necessary to identify which user wrote which article. This can easily be done by removing the comment tags round the following: by <?php the_author() ?> in the 'Main Template' in Kubrick. HTH. WordPress is still a great bit of software. Am sure it will all be fine!

One thing though, with multiple contributors it might be necessary to identify which user wrote which article. This can easily be done by removing the comment tags round the following:

by <?php the_author() ?>

in the ‘Main Template’ in Kubrick. HTH.

]]> by: quentinsf http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-12 Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:31:10 +0000 http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-12 Yes, Drupal might have been better, but in the end it came down to choosing something simple (we'd had a lot of problems with PostNuke) and familiar (we both use WordPress for our blogs) because we didn't have too much time to spend on it! We may live to regret this, of course, and spend more time in future than we saved now! Yes, Drupal might have been better, but in the end it came down to choosing something simple (we’d had a lot of problems with PostNuke) and familiar (we both use WordPress for our blogs) because we didn’t have too much time to spend on it!

We may live to regret this, of course, and spend more time in future than we saved now!

]]> by: Dave Briggs http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-11 Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:05:16 +0000 http://www.livingwithoutmicrosoft.org/2005/11/23/open-source-content-management-systems-reviewed/#comment-11 Good to see this site back online. I have used Drupal on a couple of sites, and am a little surprised that WordPress has been chosen to run Living Without Microsoft on - multi user blogging is much easier with Drupal, IMO, though I use WordPress for my personal blog. Good to see this site back online.

I have used Drupal on a couple of sites, and am a little surprised that WordPress has been chosen to run Living Without Microsoft on - multi user blogging is much easier with Drupal, IMO, though I use WordPress for my personal blog.

]]>